William Blake's A Poison Tree

Symbolism, Meaning, and Possible Interpretation of the Atypical Poem

© Megan B. Wyatt

Aug 4, 2008
A Poison Tree, Dane Dowling
Though the poem deals with complex symbolism and seemingly amoral themes, Blake might be using the radical ideas to open the minds and morals of his readers.

William Blake’s poem “A Poison Tree” demonstrates the complexities and analogies buried deep within his poetry. The poem itself is dark and twisted, and most readers would find the poem’s ideas alarming.

"A Poison Tree" Summary

In the beginning of the poem, the speaker tells of his anger toward a friend and a foe and how each differed. With his friend, he expressed his anger and was relieved of it, but with his foe, he did not express it, which fed his fury.

Blake’s speaker continues, describing how he emotionally nourished his wrath, or tree, until an apple grew from it, which his enemy took although he knew it was his. In the end of the poem, the speaker has killed his opponent, and he is not only unremorseful, but also happy and proud. Blake uses a confident and assertive tone, which makes the speaker sound all-powerful and merciless, two ideas feared when combined. Read a further synopsis here.

Interpretation and Symbolism

After reading such an amoral poem, the search for hope or alternate meaning begins. A metaphor lives inside the poem, but instead of making the poem less wicked, the analogy confuses and questions faith.

Symbolically, the speaker represents God, the foe and garden represent Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, and the tree represents the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil in Genesis. If this analogy is true, it shows God rejoicing in killing his enemies, which most people think the God they know would never do.

Blake’s poem is peculiar even for today’s standards, and his analogy may be ruthless and insensitive, but he does get the reader thinking. By looking further into the poem, we find that the speaker nourishes and feeds his wrath, which symbolically is the tree from the Garden of Eden. Is Blake suggesting that God fed his wrath and anger into the tree and intended for man to eat from it? If so, He is creating a world doomed to His wrath and anger, an idea just about anybody would shutter at.

Possible Reasoning

Is this really what Blake believes, or is he only trying to open the minds of his readers? We probably will never know whether Blake’s beliefs were this jaded, but we can explore his purpose in writing “A Poison Tree” by thinking and questioning instead of shutting out the disturbing idea of a coldhearted God.

By thinking back to childhood when our brains were hardwiring for life, most of us recall learning of a loving God whose love never failed, even in the most grotesque and horrifying biblical passages.

Remember Noah and the ark told to children in an almost fairytale-ish manner? As children, we learn mostly of a God who saves His creation and of His promise never to destroy creation again because what child could bear the thought of their “father” destroying nearly all of his children who are his beloved creation?

The actual story would be bloody, brutal, and bottomless in questions, so most teachers and mentors package it and tie a pretty ribbon around it. What ever happened to not judging a book by its cover or a package by its wrapping?

Searching Blake’s poem through questioning faith and supposed truths instead of accepting spoon-fed stories and rules of society can lead to growth in our spirituality, strength, and intelligence.


The copyright of the article William Blake's A Poison Tree in 18th & 19th Century British Fiction is owned by Megan B. Wyatt. Permission to republish William Blake's A Poison Tree in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


A Poison Tree, Dane Dowling
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Dec 22, 2008 12:52 PM
Guest :
Great interpetation!!
Jan 19, 2009 2:27 PM
Guest :
Wow! amazing interpretation.Way to go Wyatt!!!11
Jan 31, 2009 1:10 AM
Guest :
OWNAGE OWNAGE OWNAGE OWNAGE
Feb 4, 2009 7:27 AM
Guest :
This is an excellent interpretation. It's brought many new ideas to mind.
Mar 4, 2009 5:30 PM
Guest :
Wow great job, thank you so much for this interpretation. It has helped me a lot. Appreciate it.
Apr 10, 2009 6:36 AM
wishunamaste :
This is poetry at its best. So many interpretations can be extracted, discussed, and debated. Certainly the above interpretation is interesting and certainly another way of looking at this poem. The first quatrain (stanza) ,however, isn't explained or really fit with the Adam and Eve interpretation. Like the essence of poetry itself, metaphor comes from meaning and interpretation as well as a mindset.
In the poem the speaker has an issue with both persons but one is already a friend and one is a foe. The question is, did he become a foe because the speaker did not discuss his issue thus causing a grievance? Is this the cause of labeling him a foe? As Linda pointed out, was the speaker not close enough to the foe to allow for discussion and resolve the hate? Linda also points out two problems that really aren't problems.
This battle of resolve is going on in the speaker's mind. The garden is growing in the speakers mind. Although I disagree, with the idea of a negation of moral impact some may perhaps interpret the speaker circumventing his consuming hatred by imagining the death of his foe which ends the hate. Based on her idea (mindset) that things would have gotten worse if the speaker discussed the issue, the speaker already cannot resolve the issue because his mindset is foe.
I would like to think the speaker realizes the foe is his ego (voice in the head) and hatred for another person. He is destroying his own demons as well as the hatred that is poisoning his own body (his garden-his peace). He realizes that foe is a mental construct and his inability to look past the other person's transgression is consuming his peace of mind. (continue)
Apr 10, 2009 6:37 AM
wishunamaste :

A NEW INTERPRETATION
Quickly, another interpretation (off the cuff here), which I never read or heard, is that the speaker is speaking solely of himself. If you’ve ever considered how we have double standards for when things go wrong in our own lives as opposed to our friends. We berate ourselves when we make mistakes but when our friends make mistakes we are a friend in their time of need with understanding and guidance and we are there just to listen.
The speaker perhaps is saying when I have an issue with myself (mistake, issue) and treat myself as a friend by problem solving, logic, praying , and forgiveness there is no regret-no grievance. However, when I treat myself like a foe with labeling,(I am so stupid) frustration, emotional reasoning, and build up of anger grows in the garden of my mind. What is worse is when we keep these fears to ourselves and mask them with smiles rather than seeking help or helping ourselves as we would help a friend. Do we call our friends stupid in their time of need?
The third stanza is realization of the problem and the final stanza is the resolution; destroying the demon from within. “A good poem does not reveal itself on its first read.” See if you can agree with my interpretation.


Apr 29, 2009 6:00 PM
Guest :
This helped me so much! Thank you!
Jul 2, 2009 9:33 AM
Guest :
Nice. Thanks.
Jul 30, 2009 12:09 AM
Guest :
This interpretation was really good. It really helped me a lot. Thank you.
Aug 12, 2009 8:49 PM
Guest :
Thank You.... helped me SO MUCH was SO convused at first lol
Aug 20, 2009 5:10 AM
Guest :
didnt think of that yet.
Sep 8, 2009 3:24 AM
Guest :
The ONE THING I hadn't thought of yet was Blake, being a dissenter, having a religious meaning behind this!
13 Comments